Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
The Introductory Physics Course Revisions at Illinois
  (Mats Selen, UIUC Department of Physics)
  • Overview
    • What we teach & who we teach it to.
    • How it used to work.
    • How we do it now.
    • Some Feedback
  • A glance at the key aspects of our approach.
    • WEB-centric organization (for us as much as them)
    • Peer instruction in Discussion & Lab sections (TA training).
    • ACTs & Preflights in Lecture
    • Homework & Interactive Examples
    • Exams
  • Concluding Thoughts
2
 
3
How it used to work:
  • Tradition, Tradition, Tradition
    • Lecturer “owns” the course and is free to
      “reinvent the flat tire” every semester.
    • Discussion TAs pretty much on their own.
    • Labs intellectually disconnected from rest of course.


  • RESULTS:  NOBODY IS HAPPY !!
    • Professor dislikes it since it’s a monster teaching assignment.
    • Students dislike it because the professor dislikes it (and because course is always Version 1.0)
    • The college dislikes it because students dislike it.


4
How we do it now:
  • Integrate all aspects of a course using active learning methods in a sustainable team teaching environment.
    •  Typically 3 faculty share the load:
      • Lecturer (lectures, ACTs, preflights, exams).
      • Discussion Director (TA training, quizzes, exams).
      • Lab Director (TA training, web homework, exams).
    •  Course administration is shared responsibility:
      • Faculty meet at least once a week with each-other and with their TA’s to plan the campaign.
      • Overall co-ordination is very tight (web helps this).
      • Everybody works on creating exams.


5
"Recycled & tuned from semester..."
      • Recycled & tuned from semester to semester.
      • People don’t need to re-invent the whole stew, but can focus on the spices!


  • Advantages of this approach:
    • Existing (evolving) infrastructure lowers the bar for   participation.
      • This is now seen as a reasonable teaching load.
      • Most of our new junior faculty start teaching in these courses (i.e. not a heavy assignment).
    • Pain & Gain are shared
      • No burnout & No heroes.
      • Makes it possible to keep quality high and material consistent even though instructors are changing.
      • 47 faculty have taught in these courses !
6
Positive Feedback
7
Some Key Aspects
  • WEB-centric organization
  • Peer instruction in Discussion & Lab sections
  • ACTs & Preflights in Lecture
  • Homework & Interactive Examples
  • Exams
8
"All course materials available on-line"
  • All course materials available on-line.
    •  Lectures, discussion & lab materials, exams…
    •  Makes our job easier (copy spring01 ® fall01).

  • All students do several on-line assignments every week:
    •  Homework, Interactive Examples, Quizzes
    •  Preflights for lectures, labs & discussion
    •  Exam preparation & exam results
    •  All grades & progress throughout the semester
      • Students know in advance what everything is worth and the final thresholds for A,B,C,D,F etc
9
"WEB-centric organization"
  • WEB-centric organization
  • Peer instruction in Discussion & Lab sections
  • ACTs & Preflights in Lecture
  • Homework & Interactive Examples
  • Exams
10
Discussion Sections
11
Lab Sections
12
Details of some key components:
  • WEB-centric organization
  • Peer instruction in Discussion & Lab sections
  • ACTs & Preflights in Lecture
  • Homework & Interactive Examples
  • Exams
13
Active Learning in Lecture (ACTs):
What’s the big idea ?
  • Break the lecture into 10-15 minute segments (attention span).
  • Lecture segments separated by 3-5 minute Active Learning Segments (ACTs).
    • Students work in groups of 3-4 on a conceptual problem posed by the lecturer.
    • Lecturer and (several TA’s) wander around the room asking leading questions.
      • This helps the students figure out problem and also helps
        the lecturer understand the students misconceptions.
    • Students “Vote” on the correct answer (in groups)
    • Lecturer presents solution and discusses perceived misconceptions.
    • Lecturer does appropriate demo (if possible).
14
Example: Lecture 5, Act 4
Force and acceleration
  • A block weighing 4 lbs is hung from a rope attached to a spring scale. When the other side of the scale is attached to a wall it reads 4 lbs.  What will the scale read when the other side is instead attached to another block weighing 4 lbs?
15
Pre-Flights !!

  • Students are asked to answer a set of conceptual questions
    (on the Web) prior to every lecture.


  • The main structure is:
    • Students read about material in text.
    • Students answer pre-flight questions on material prior to lecture.
      • Physics 101 PF’s due at 6am, lecture starts at 1pm.
      • Graded on participation, not correctness.
    • Instructor uses pre-flight responses to guide lecture preparation.
      • Stress difficult material
    • Pre-flights are reviewed during lecture, often presented again as ACTs, and often capped off with a  demo.
  • With careful preparation, pre-flights form the “backbone” of the lecture.
16
 
17
Lecture 2, Pre-Flights 1&2
  • If the average velocity of a car during a trip along a straight road is positive, is it possible for the instantaneous velocity at some time during the trip to be negative?
  • 1 - Yes
  • 2 - No
18
Details of some key components:
  • WEB-centric organization
  • Peer instruction in Discussion & Lab sections
  • ACTs & Preflights in Lecture
  • Homework & Interactive Examples
  • Exams
19
Details of some key components:
  • WEB-centric organization
  • Peer instruction in Discussion & Lab sections
  • ACTs & Preflights in Lecture
  • Homework & Interactive Examples
  • Exams
20
"Three mid-terms & one comprehensive..."
  • Three mid-terms & one comprehensive final (typically).
  • Combined worth ~ 60% of final grade.
  • All multiple choice (machine graded).
    • PROS:
      • Uniform & Fair.
      • Useful for tracking changes, education research…
      • WEB interface possible for practice (before exam night) and help/explanations (after exam).
    • CONS:
      • Harder to give partial credit…
      • But not impossible: we have a scheme !
21
 
22
"Analysis of exam “data"
  • Analysis of exam “data” is very interesting
    (and useful for education research).
23
Instant exam feedback is possible:
  • The minute they leave the exam, students can go on the web, enter their answers into a web version of the exam they just took, and see what their raw score is:












  • After the exam has been graded (next day) students can find detailed statistics on each problem on the web.
24
Why Is The Revision Program Working at UIUC ?
  • Key 1: Design Process was a Collective Effort
    • Committee of eight met for a year to generate the design
    • These people became the core
  • Key 2: Infrastructure
    • People (veteran faculty, computing help, lecture, lab & secretarial support)
    • Computing (all materials on NT server, faculty get NT machine for desk while teaching)
    • Welcome to 1XX, here’s how we do things….
  • Key 3: Team-Teaching
    • All faculty (3-4 per course) do faculty-type jobs
    • Pain and Gain are shared … no more burnout… NO HEROES
  • Key 4: Administrative Support
    • Released time essential for initial creation of materials
    • Total support for systemic change… JUST DO IT!
    • Continuing support (e.g., new Assoc Head position) to maintain the system as the “newness” wears off.
25
What Does it Take to Work Elsewhere?
  • ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
    • An Unnatural Act ??
    • Probably more important than any of the substantive details presented earlier!
  • MAJOR OBSTACLES: FACULTY!!
    • Cultural issue: “My” Course
      • Course is NOT just lectures
      • Progress comes from contributions of many
    • Character issue: The Arrogance of Physicists
      • Its hard to learn (i.e. accept guidance) from others !
      • What makes effective instruction is largely an empirical question.